ORIGINAL PAPER
Descriptive and predictive analysis of trace metals in coal ash: statistical insights and modeling
 
More details
Hide details
1
AGH University of Krakow
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-07-15
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-03-31
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-04-10
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-02
 
 
Corresponding author
Monika Chuchro   

AGH University of Krakow
 
 
Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 2026;42(2):89-111
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Coal combustion generates ash that contains trace metals with both economic and environmental relevance. This study aims to assess the concentration, variability, and inter-element relationships of nine trace metals (Sb, Co, Cu, Ga, Mo, Ni, Ag, V, Zn) in ash samples from 28 coal specimens of varying rank (lignite, subbituminous, and bituminous) collected from Polish deposits. Elemental concentrations were determined via ICP-MS, and oxide composition was analyzed to examine geochemical associations. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and predictive modeling (multiple linear regression and Support Vector Machine, SVM) were applied to characterize elemental behavior and identify reliable predictors of metal content in ash. The results show substantial variability in elemental concentrations, with several metals (e.g., Ni, V, Zn) enriched in ash relative to parent coal. Bituminous coal ashes generally exhibited higher average concentrations than lignite ashes, except for Zn. Strong linear correlations were found between selected metal pairs (e.g., Cu–Co, Ag–Co), while correlations with oxides (notably Al2O3, Fe2O3, Cr2O3) supported their role in controlling metal distribution. Regression models demonstrated predictive capability for most elements (R2 up to 0.88), with SVM models showing improved performance (R2 up to 0.94, MAPE as low as 19.78%). These findings highlight the importance of oxide composition in trace metal behavior and provide a methodological basis for assessing ash quality, environmental risk, and potential resource recovery.
FUNDING
This research project was partly supported by the AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, as a part of a statutory project.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Analiza opisowa i predykcyjna metali śladowych w popiołach ze spalania węgla: ujęcie statystyczne i modelowanie
węgiel, popiół, modele regresyjne, eksploracyjna analiza danych, pierwiastki krytyczne
Spalanie węgla generuje popioły zawierające pierwiastki śladowe o istotnym znaczeniu gospodarczym i środowiskowym. Celem niniejszego badania była ocena stężenia, zmienności oraz relacji pomiędzy dziewięcioma metalami śladowymi (Sb, Co, Cu, Ga, Mo, Ni, Ag, V, Zn) w próbkach popiołów uzyskanych z 28 próbek węgla o różnym stopniu uwęglenia (węgiel brunatny, brunatny twardy i kamienny) pochodzących z polskich złóż. Stężenia pierwiastków oznaczono metodą ICP-MS, a analizę składu tlenkowego przeprowadzono w celu identyfikacji powiązań geochemicznych. Wykorzystano statystyki opisowe, analizę korelacji oraz modele predykcyjne (regresja liniowa wieloraka i maszyny wektorów nośnych – SVM) do scharakteryzowania zachowania pierwiastków i wskazania niezawodnych predyktorów ich zawartości w popiele. Wyniki wykazały znaczną zmienność stężeń pierwiastków, przy czym niektóre metale (np. Ni, V, Zn) uległy wzbogaceniu w popiele względem węgla macierzystego. Popioły z węgla kamiennego zawierały przeciętnie wyższe stężenia metali niż z węgla brunatnego, z wyjątkiem cynku. Zaobserwowano silne korelacje liniowe pomiędzy wybranymi parami metali (np. Cu–Co, Ag–Co) oraz istotne związki z tlenkami (zwłaszcza Al2O3, Fe2O3, Cr2O3), co potwierdza ich wpływ na rozkład metali. Modele regresji wykazały dobrą zdolność predykcyjną (R2 do 0,88), a modele SVM uzyskały jeszcze lepsze wyniki (R2 do 0,94, MAPE nawet 19,78%). Uzyskane wyniki podkreślają znaczenie składu tlenkowego w analizie zachowania pierwiastków śladowych i dostarczają metodycznych podstaw do oceny jakości popiołu, ryzyka środowiskowego i możliwości odzysku surowców.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Akinyemi et al. 2020 – Akinyemi, S.A., Adebayo, O.F., Nyakuma, B.B., Adegoke, A.K., Aturamu, O.A., OlaOlorun, O.A., Adetunji, A., Hower, J.C., Hood, M.M. and Jauro, A. 2020. Petrology, physicochemical and thermal analyses of selected cretaceous coals from the Benue Trough Basin in Nigeria. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology 7(1), pp. 26–42, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789....
 
2.
Asokan et al. 2005 – Asokan, P., Saxena, M. and Asolekar, S.R. 2005. Coal combustion residues – environmental implications and recycling potentials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43(3), pp. 239–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
 
3.
Bielowicz et al. 2018 – Bielowicz, B., Botor, D., Misiak, J. and Wagner, M. 2018. Critical Elements in Fly Ash from the Combustion of Bituminous Coal in Major Polish Power Plants. E3S Web of Conferences, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
 
4.
Dagwar et al. 2025 – Dagwar, P.P., Iqbal, S.S. and Dutta, D. 2025. Sustainable recovery of rare Earth elements from industrial waste: A path to circular economy and environmental health. Waste Management Bulletin 3(1), pp. 373–390, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.....
 
5.
Dai, S. and Finkelman, R.B. 2018. Coal as a promising source of critical elements: Progress and future prospects. International Journal of Coal Geology 186, pp. 155–164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal....
 
6.
Dai et al. 2012 – Dai, S., Ren, D., Chou, C.L., Finkelman, R.B., Seredin, V.V. and Zhou, Y. 2012. Geochemistry of trace elements in Chinese coals: A review of abundances, genetic types, impacts on human health, and industrial utilization. International Journal of Coal Geology 94, pp. 3–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal....
 
7.
Font et al. 2007 – Font, O., Querol, X., Juan, R., Casado, R., Ruiz, C.R., López-Soler, Á., Coca, P. and Peña, F.G. 2007. Recovery of gallium and vanadium from gasification fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials 139(3), pp. 413–423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz....
 
8.
Franus et al. 2015 – Franus, W., Wiatros-Motyka, M.M. and Wdowin, M. 2015. Coal fly ash as a resource for rare earth elements. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22(12), pp. 9464–9474, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
9.
Gaustad et al. 2021 – Gaustad, G., Williams, E. and Leader, A. 2021. Rare earth metals from secondary sources: Review of potential supply from waste and byproducts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
 
10.
Harkness et al. 2015 – Harkness, J.S., Ruhl, L.S., Millot, R., Kloppman, W., Hower, J.C., Hsu-Kim, H. and Vengosh, A. 2015. Lithium Isotope Fingerprints in Coal and Coal Combustion Residuals from the United States. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 13, pp. 134–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proe....
 
11.
Hauke, J. and Kossowski, T. 2011. Comparison of Values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data. Quaestiones Geographicae 30(2), pp. 87–93, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117....
 
12.
Izquierdo et al. 2013 – Izquierdo, M., Tye, A.M. and Chenery, S.R. 2013. Measuring reactive pools of Cd, Pb and Zn in coal fly ash from the UK using isotopic dilution assays. Applied Geochemistry 33, pp. 41–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apge....
 
13.
Joshi et al. 2025 – Joshi, K., Magdouli, S. and Brar, S.K. 2025. Bioleaching for the recovery of rare earth elements from industrial waste: A sustainable approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
 
14.
Ketris, M.P. and Yudovich, Ya.E. 2009. Estimations of Clarkes for Carbonaceous biolithes: World averages for trace element contents in black shales and coals. International Journal of Coal Geology 78(2), pp. 135–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal....
 
15.
Lefticariu et al. 2020 – Lefticariu, L., Klitzing, K.L. and Kolker, A. 2020. Rare Earth Elements and Yttrium (REY) in coal mine drainage from the Illinois Basin, USA. International Journal of Coal Geology 217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal....
 
16.
Marshall, G. and Jonker, L. 2010. An introduction to descriptive statistics: A review and practical guide. Radiography 16(4), pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi....
 
17.
Pan et al. 2018 – Pan, J., Zhou, C., Liu, C., Tang, M., Cao, S., Hu, T., Ji, W., Luo, Y., Wen, M. and Zhang, N. 2018. Modes of Occurrence of Rare Earth Elements in Coal Fly Ash: A Case Study. Energy & Fuels 32(9), pp. 9738–9743, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.en....
 
18.
Quina et al. 2018 – Quina, M.J., Bontempi, E., Bogush, A., Schlumberger, S., Weibel, G., Braga, R., Funari, V., Hyks, J., Rasmussen, E. and Lederer, J. 2018. Technologies for the management of MSW incineration ashes from gas cleaning: New perspectives on recovery of secondary raw materials and circular economy. Science of The Total Environment 635, pp. 526–542, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
19.
Seredin, V.V. 1996. Rare earth element-bearing coals from the Russian Far East deposits. International Journal of Coal Geology 30(1–2), pp. 101–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-5....
 
20.
Wang et al. 2019 – Wang, T., Li, Y., Jin, L., Wang, D. and Hu, H. 2019. Steam catalytic cracking of coal tar over iron-containing mixed metal oxides. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 97(3), pp. 702–708, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2....
 
21.
Zhang et al. 2018 – Zhang, L., Tao, Y. and Yang, L. 2018. Research on flow field and kinematic characteristics of fly ash particles in rotary triboelectrostatic separator. Powder Technology 336, pp. 168–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powt....
 
eISSN:2299-2324
ISSN:0860-0953
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top