Practical applications from decision-making techniques for selection of suitable mining method in Iran
Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 2009;25(3):57-77
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Mining method selection for an explored ore-body is the critical and problematic issues in mining engineering. Selection of an unsuitable method with regards to deposit characteristics may make exploitation of the ore-body troublesome and sometimes impossible or less economic. In the past, selection of extraction method was based primarily on operating experience at similar type mine and on methods already in use in the districts of the deposit. Recently application of decision theory has been paid attention for different selection problems. Decision-making methods are not using customarily in mining engineering but they are techniques can provide solutions to the problems involving conflicting and multiple criteria as mining method selection problems. This study presents of different decision making methods in complex environment of mining activities for optimal and efficient production. The focus of this article is on inspection of the suitable mining method selection and presentation of procedure, and is based on the decision theory. This paper is divided into two sections. The first section provides an overview of the mining method selection problems and decision making theory. The second section introduces an application of the Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) for mining method selection accompanied by practical illustrations.
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Praktyczne zastosowania technik podejmowania decyzji do wyboru odpowiednich technologii eksploatacji w Iranie
teoria podejmowania decyzji, analiza wielokryterialna, analiza decyzyjna, wybór metody, metoda eksploatacji, zarządzanie zasobami
Wybór metody eksploatacji dla udokumentowanego złoża rudy jest podstawowym i bardzo trudnym zagadnieniem w inżynierii górniczej. Wybór niewłaściwej technologii eksploatacji dla złoża o określonej charakterystyce może spowodować wiele kłopotów, a w rezultacie może doprowadzić do braku możliwości wybrania tego złoża lub uczynić eksploatację mniej opłacalną. W przeszłości wybór metody eksploatacji wykonywany był na podstawie doświadczeń ruchowych w kopalniach podobnego typu, a opierano się na metodach już wykorzystywanych w innych częściach tego złoża. Ostatnio zwrócono uwagę na możliwość wykorzystania metod podejmowania decyzji do rozwiązywania problemów związanych z takim wyborem. Takie metody podejmowania decyzji nie są zwykle używane w górnictwie, ale są to techniki, które mogą dać rozwiązanie w zagadnieniach, w których występuje wiele wzajemnie sprzecznych kryteriów tak jak to ma miejsce w przypadku wyboru technologii eksploatacji. Artykuł prezentuje różne metody podejmowania decyzji dla osiągnięcia optymalnej i wydajnej produkcji w złożonych uwarunkowaniach związanych z działalnością górniczą. Celem tego artykułu jest, w oparciu o teorie podejmowania decyzji, wybór odpowiedniej metody eksploatacji oraz opis tej procedury. Artykuł podzielono na dwie części. Pierwsza część daje przegląd problemów związanych z wyborem metody eksploatacji oraz teorię podejmowania decyzji. Druga część omawia wielokryterialną analizę decyzyjną zastosowaną do wyboru metody eksploatacji wraz z przykładami.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Nicholas D.E., 1993 - Selection Procedure. Mining Engineering Handbook. Hartman, H. SME. New York, pp. 2090-2105.
2.
Samimi Namin F., Shahriar K., Karimi Nasab S., 2004 - Method selection of MEHDI ABAD Lead-Zinc Mine and Related Problems. 5th ISMST Conferences, China.
3.
Yiming W., Ying F.,Weixuan X., 2004 - Multiple Objective - integrated methodology of Global Optimum Decision-Making on Mineral Exploitation. Computer & Industrial Engineering vol. 46, pp. 363-372.
4.
Peele R., Church J., 1941 - Mining Engineering Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, INC vol. 1.
5.
Boshkov S., Wright F., 1973 - Basic and Parametric Criteria in the Selection, Design and Development of Underground Mining System. SME Mining Engineering Handbook. Cummins and Given, SME, New York, Vol. 1, pp. 12.2-12.13.
6.
Morrison R.G.K., 1976 - AQ Philosophy of Ground Control. McGill University. Montreal, Canada, pp. 125-159.
7.
Nicholas D., Mark J., 1981 - Feasibility Study-Selection of a Mining Method Integrating Rock Mechanics and Mine Planning, 5th Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, San Francisco, vol. 2, pp. 1018-1031.
8.
Labscher D., 1981 - Selection of Mass Underground Mining Methods. Design and Operation of Caving and Sublevel Stoping Mines. New York, AIME, Chapter 3.
9.
Hartman H.L., 2002 - Introductory mining engineering. John Wiley & sons, Inc, Second edition.
10.
Marano G., Everitt A., 1987 - Selection of Mining Method and Equipment for block 58, Shabanie Mine, Zimbabwe. African Mining Conference. Harare. 31Aug-2Sept, pp. 229-238.
11.
Bandopadhyay S., Vencata S., 1988 - Rule-based Expert System for Mining Method Selection. CIM Bulletin. V81, pp. 84-88.
12.
Agoshkov M., Borisov S., Boyarsky V., 1988 - Classification of Ore Deposit Mining Systems.Mining of Ores and Non-Metalic Minerals. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, pp. 59-62.
13.
Mutagwaba W., Terezopoulos N., 1994 - Knowledge-based System for Mine Method Selection. Transactions - Institution of Mining & Metallurgy.
14.
Miller L., Pakalnis R., Poulin R., 1995 - UBC Mining Method Selection. International symposium on mine planning and equipment selection. Singh.
15.
Hamrin H., 1988 - Choosing Underground Mining Method Techniques in Underground Mining. Mining Engineering Handbook, USA, pp. 45-85.
16.
Tatiya R., 1998 - Computer Assisted Economic Analysis to Selected a Stoping Method. CIM Bulletin vol. 91.
17.
Basu J., 1999 - Mining Method Selection Expert System with Prototype with Australian Case Studies. International symposium on mine planning and equipment selection, Ukraine.
18.
Kahriman A., 2000 - Selection of Optimum Underground Mining Method for Kayseri Pynarbapy- Pulpynar Chrome Ore. Middle East Technical University. Turkey.
19.
Karadogan A., Kahriman A., 2001 - A New Approach in Selection of Underground Mining Method. International Scientific Conference SGEM, Bulgaria.
20.
Kesimal A., Bascetin A., 2002 - Application of Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making in Mining Operations. Mineral Resources Engineering vol. 11, pp. 59-72.
21.
Clayton C., Pakalnis R., Meech J., 2002 - A Knowledge-based System for Selecting a Mining Method. IPPM conference, Canada.
22.
Guray C., Celebi N.,Atalay V., Gunhan A., 2003 - Ore-Age: a Hybrid System for Assisting and Teaching Mining Method Selection. Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
23.
Yiming W., Ying F., Weixuan X., 2003 - An Integrated Methodology for Decision Making of Mining Method Selection. Manufacturing Technology and Management, China.
24.
Samimi Namin F., Shahriar K., Karimi Nasab S., 2003 - Fuzzy Decision Making for Mining Method Selection in Third Anomaly Gol-E-Gohar Deposit. 18th International mining congress and exhibition of Turkey, I MCET.
25.
Shahriar K., Shariati V., Samimi Namin F., 2007 - Geomechanical Characteristics Study of Deposit in Underground Mining Method Selection Process. 11th ISRM Conferences, Portugal.
26.
Samimi Namin F. Ph.D., 2008 - Thesis. Faculty of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering. Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
27.
Mihaylov G., 2005 - A Model and Procedure for Selecting Underground Mining Methods. World Mining Congress, Tehran, Iran.
28.
Miranda C., Almeida , 2005 - Mining Methods Selection Based on Multicriteria Models. Application of Computes and operation research in the mineral industry, London.
29.
Bascetin A., 2007 - A Decision Support System Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) For the Optimal Environmental Reclamation of an Open-pit Mine, Environmental Geology vol. 52, pp. 663-672.
30.
Zhifeng C., Ph.D., 2005 - Thesis. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering College of Engineering. Kansas State University, Manhattan, pp. 7.
34.
Huang C.L., Yoon K., 1981 - Multi Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York, Springer-Verlag.
35.
Samimi Namin F., Shahriar K., Ataeepour M., Dehghani H., 2008 - A New Model for Mining Method Selection of Mineral Deposit Based on Fuzzy Decision Making, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM) vol. 108, pp. 381-391.
36.
Shih H.S., Shyur H.J., Lee E.S., 2007 - An Extension of TOPSIS for Group Decision Making. Mathematical and Compute Modeling vol. 45, pp. 801-813.
37.
Brans J.P., Vincke P.H., Marshal B., 1986 - How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operation Research vol. 24, pp. 228-38.
38.
Pohekar S.D., Ramachandran M., 2004 - Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-A review. Renewable and sustainable Energy Reviews vol. 8, pp. 365-381.
39.
Albadavi A., Chaharsooghi K., Esfahanipour A., 2007 - Discrete Optimization Decision Making in Stock Trading: An Application of PROMETHEE. European Journal of Operation Research vol. 177, pp. 673-683.
40.
Shariati V. MS.c., 2006 - Thesis. Faculty of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering. Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
41.
Macharis C., Springael J., Berucker K., Verbeke A., 2004 - PROMETHEE and AHP: The Design of Operational Synergies in Multicriteria Analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE whit Ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operation Research vol. 153, pp. 307-317.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2299-2324 |
| ISSN: | 0860-0953 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
