Environmental impact assessment of mining activities. A new approach for mining methods selection
More details
Hide details
Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 2011;27(2):113-143
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Mining activities from exploration to final material handling up to shipment pass through various stages where environmental pollution results. Mining method can and should be selected in such a way that their impact on individuals and environmental to be minimized. Until now, different mining specialists have carried out many studies on mining method selection. Unfortunately neither of previous approaches takes into account of the environmental consideration and methodology for assessment of environmental impacts criterion. This paper discusses environmental impacts of mining operations associated with different mining methods. For this purpose, the Folchi approach was modified for environmental impact assessment which associates the mining methods inherently and developed of a procedure to assist a selecting of mining method. Firstly, the general and explanatory information about effects of mining on the environmental pollution are given in the paper. Moreover field and purposes of the study are introduced. The paper presents an environmental assessment for different mining methods. And, secondly, the impacts of each mining methods on environment are focused and discussed. Finally, some concluding remarks are made and the related applications for the mining method selection are discussed by using in a case study. As the main advantage, this new algorithm takes several environmental issues and their interaction takes into consideration for environmental assessment of a mining method selection.
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Ocena wpływu górnictwa na środowisko. Nowe podejście do wyboru metod eksploatacji
wpływ na środowisko, przemysł górniczy, metoda eksploatacji, metoda Folchiego, złoże rudy żelaza, Gol-E-Gohar, Iran
Działania górnicze, począwszy od rozpoznania złóż aż po transport finalnego produktu, to szereg etapów prowadzących do zanieczyszczenia środowiska. Metody eksploatacji mogą i powinny być dobierane w taki sposób, by ich wpływ na środowisko i człowieka był jak najmniejszy. Różni specjaliści zajmujący się górnictwem przeprowadzili do tej pory szereg badań dotyczących zagadnienia wyboru metod eksploatacji. Niestety, dotychczas stosowane podejścia nie brały pod uwagę środowiska i metodologii, w których wpływ na środowisko stanowiłby kryterium oceny. Ta praca przedstawia wpływ operacji górniczych na środowisko w zależności od zastosowanych systemów eksploatacji. W tym celu wykorzystano metodę Folchi'ego, odpowiednio zmodyfikowaną dla potrzeb oceny wpływu na środowisko, do której włączono metody eksploatacji i opracowano procedury pomagające dokonać wyboru tych właściwych. Na wstępie przedstawione zostały ogólne i objaśniające informacje na temat wpływu górnictwa na zanieczyszczenie środowiska. Następnie zaprezentowano przedmiot i cele badania. Praca przedstawia ocenę środowiskową dla różnych systemów eksploatacji. Omawia również szczegółowo wpływ poszczególnych metod eksploatacji na środowisko wraz z oceną. W podsumowaniu zawarto uwagi końcowe oraz przedyskutowano ich zastosowania dla wyboru metod eksploatacji na przykładzie studium przypadku. Główną zaletą nowego algorytmu jest fakt, iż bierze pod uwagę interakcję wielu czynników środowiskowych przy ocenie wpływu na środowisko wybranych metod eksploatacji.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Ashtiani M., 2005 - Environmental considerations in the mines. Paper presented at the 1st Environmental Considerations in the Mines, National Conference, Kerman, Iran, pp. 30-38.
2.
Baker D. E., Amacher M. C., 1982 - Nickel, copper, zinc and cadmium. [In:] Page AL,Miller R. H., Keeney D. R. (eds.) Methods of soil analysis: part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Agronomy no. 9. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 323-336.
3.
Bascetin A., 2004 - An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at orhaneli open pit coal mine. Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), Section A-Mining Technology 113, pp. 192-199.
4.
Bascetin A., 2007 - A decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open pit mine. Environmental Geology 52, pp. 663-672.
5.
Bhattacharya J., 2003 - Principles of mine planning, Published by Sunil Sachdev and printed by Ravi Sachdev at Allied Publisher PVT. LTD. New Delhi, pp. 30-31.
6.
Blodgett S., Kuipers J. R., 2002 - Technical report on underground hard-rock mining: subsidence and hydrologic environmental impacts. Center for Science in Public Participation, pp. 36-38.
7.
Casiot C., Ujevic M., Munoz M., Seidel J. L., Elbaz-Poulichet F., 2007 - Antimony and arsenic mobility in a creek draining an antimony mine abandoned 85 years ago (upper Orb basin, France). Appl. Geochem. 22, pp. 788-798.
8.
Chalupnik S., Wysocka M., 2008 - Radium removal from mine waters in underground treatment installations. J Environ Radioact (in press).
9.
Dudka S., Adriano D. C., 1997 - Environmental impacts of metal ore mining and processing: a review. J Environ. Qual. 26, pp. 590-602.
10.
Fernandez-Galvez J., Barahona E., Iriarte A., Mingorance M. D., 2007 - A simple methodology for the evaluation of groundwater pollution risks. Sci Total Environ 378, pp. 67-70.
11.
Folchi R., 2003 - Environmental impact statement for mining with explosives: a quantitative method, I.S.E.E. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique. Northville, Tennessee, USA.
12.
Gobling S., 2001 - Entropy production as a measure for resource use applied to metallurgical processes. Paper presented at The Science and Culture of Industrial Ecology (ISIE Conference).
13.
Hartman H. L., Mutmansky J. M., 2002 - Introductory mining engineering. Second edition, John Wiley &Sons.
14.
Haupt C., Mistry M., Wilde J., 2001 - Development of measures to minimize adverse ecological effects generated by abandoned mines in developing countries. Institut fur Bergbaukunde I. der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen 51-54.
15.
Jordanov S. H., Maletic M., Dimitrov A., Slavkov D., Paunovic P., 2007 - Waste waters from copper ores mining/flotation in 'Bucbim' mine: characterization and remediation. Desalination 213, s. 65-71.
16.
Miller L., Pakalnis R., Poulin R., 1995 - UBC Mining Method Selection. International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, Singh.
17.
Mirmohammadi M., Gholamnejad J., Fattahpour V., Seyedsadri P., Ghorbani Y., 2007 -Designing of an environmental assessment algorithm for underground mining projects, SGEM, Bulgaria, Varna.
18.
Monjezi M., Shahriar K., Dehghani H., Samimi Namin F., 2008 - Environmental impact assessment of open pit mining in Iran, Environmental Geology, Springer-verlag.
19.
Nicholas D., Mark J., 1981 - Feasibility study-selection of a mining method integrating rock mechanics and mine planning. 5th Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, San Francisco, Vol. 2, pp. 1018-1031.
20.
Nicholas D., 1993 - Selection Procedure. Mining engineering handbook, Hartman H, SME, New York, pp. 2090-2105.
21.
Osanloo M., Ataei M., 2003 - Factors affecting the selection of site for arrangement of pit rock dumps. Journal of Mining Science, 39, 148-153.
22.
Pain D. J., Sanchez A., Meharg A. A., 1998 - The Donana ecological disaster: Contamination of a world heritage estuarine marsh ecosystem with acidified pyrite mine waste. Sci. Total Environ. 222, pp. 45-54.
23.
Rawat N. S., 2003 - A study of physicochemical characteristics of respirable dust in an Indian coal mine. Sci. Total Environ. 23, pp. 47-54.
24.
Ritcy G. M., 1989 - Tailings management: problems and solutions in the mining industry. Environ. Int. 26, pp. 389-394.
25.
Samimi Namin F., (in press) Ph. D. - Thesis, Faculty of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering. Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
26.
Samimi Namin F., Shahriar K.,Ataeepour M.,Dehghani H., 2008 - A new model formining method selection of mineral deposit based on fuzzy decision making. Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM), 108, pp. 381-391.
27.
Samimi Namin F., Shahriar K., Dehghani H., 2007 - Feasibility study and economic evaluation for deposit No 3 of Gol-e-Gohar iron ore deposit. Iron Ore Conference, Australia, Perth, pp. 20-22.
28.
Sengupta M., 1993 - Environmental Impacts of Mining: Monitoring, Restoration, and Control, CRC Press. ISBN 0873714415, pp. 3-20.
29.
Shahbazi A., Khorasani N., 2003 - Investigation about interaction of environmental and mine with matrix method (case study: Lashtor stone mine in Isfahan). The 5th Congress on Safety, Occupational and Environmental Health in Mines and Related Industries (In Persian).
30.
Shahriar K., Samimi Namin F., 2007 - A new approach to waste dump site selection according to the fuzzy decision-making process. Canadian Institute of mining, metallurgy and petroleum CIM, vol. 100, pp. 1-6.
31.
Shikazono N., Zakir H. M., Sudo Y., 2008 - Zinc contamination in river water and sediments at Taisyu Zn-Pb mine area, Tsushima Island, Japan. J Geochem Explor 98, pp. 80-88.
32.
Shu W. S., Ye Z. H., Lan C. Y., Zhang Z. Q.,Wong M. H., 2001 - Acidification of lead/zinc mine tailings and its effect on heavy metal mobility. Environ. Int. 26, pp. 389-394.
33.
Smithen A. A., 1999 - Environmental considerations in the preparation of bankable feasibility documents. Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM), October-December, pp. 317-319.
34.
Tadesse S., 2000 - Environmental policy in mining: corporate strategy and planning for closure. A contribution to published book, ISBN 1-56670-365-4, pp. 415-422.
35.
White L., 1991 - Environmental engineering-an evolving discipline of increasing importance to mining. Min. Eng. 43, p. 1309.