ORIGINAL PAPER
Research on a mining area risk management system based on internal control theory
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration; Heilongjiang Province Hydraulic Research Institute, China
 
2
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, School of Mining Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, China
 
3
Heilongjiang Province Hydraulic Research Institute, China
 
4
Infrastructure Branch of the Third Construction Engineering Company LTD of China Construction Second Engineering Bureau, China
 
 
Submission date: 2023-04-22
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-08-19
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-10-03
 
 
Publication date: 2023-12-13
 
 
Corresponding author
Shengjun Zhang   

Infrastructure Branch of the Third Construction Engineering Company LTD. of China Construction Second Engineering Bureau
 
 
Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 2023;39(4):49-66
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Based on China’s resource endowment and coal mine disaster statistics, it has been found that there are many deficiencies in the management of disasters and risks in mining areas in China. Therefore, to scientifically and effectively manage mining areas, based on the theory of internal control, this paper systematically analyzes the risks of mining areas in the context of various factors and relevant suggestions. From the occurrence of mine risk to the occurrence of damage, the importance of risk management is highlighted. In accordance with the five selection principles of evaluation indicators (goal principle, comprehensiveness principle, scientificity principle, timeliness principle and focus principle) as well as the five elements of internal control (control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication and supervision), a mining area risk management framework of human-machine-environment-management – disturbance is constructed, and twenty-seven secondary risk indicators are divided. The criteria for determining the risk level and the risk response process have been established, and a more systematic and accurate mine risk management system under the theory of internal control has been formed. Finally, based on four key technologies, a dual prevention and control mechanism is formed around the system risk and job risk management system. This provides new methods and ideas for the prevention and control of coal mine safety risks and the containment of disasters and accidents.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by the Key Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (No. ZD2023E008).
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Badania systemu zarządzania ryzykiem obszaru górniczego w oparciu o teorię kontroli wewnętrznej
kontrola wewnętrzna, obszar górniczy, system zarządzania ryzykiem
Na podstawie chińskich zasobów i statystyk dotyczących katastrof w kopalniach węgla stwierdzono, że istnieje wiele niedociągnięć w zarządzaniu katastrofami i ryzykiem na obszarach górniczych w Chinach. Dlatego, aby naukowo i efektywnie zarządzać obszarami górniczymi, w oparciu o teorię kontroli wewnętrznej, w artykule systematycznie analizuje się ryzyko obszarów górniczych pod kątem różnych czynników i odpowiednich sugestii. Od wystąpienia ryzyka górniczego do wystąpienia szkód podkreśla się znaczenie zarządzania ryzykiem. Zgodnie z pięcioma zasadami wyboru wskaźników oceny: zasadą celu, zasadą kompleksowości, zasadą naukowości, zasadą terminowości i zasadą ukierunkowania, a także pięcioma elementami kontroli wewnętrznej: środowiskiem kontroli, oceną ryzyka, działaniami kontrolnymi, informacją i komunikacją oraz nadzorem, skonstruowano ramy zarządzania ryzykiem w obszarze górniczym w zakresie zakłóceń w zarządzaniu ludźmi, maszynami i środowiskiem oraz podzielono 27 drugorzędnych wskaźników ryzyka. Ustalono kryteria określania poziomu ryzyka i proces reagowania na ryzyko, a także stworzono bardziej systematyczny i dokładny system zarządzania ryzykiem kopalnianym w ramach teorii kontroli wewnętrznej. Wreszcie, w oparciu o cztery kluczowe technologie, stworzono podwójny mechanizm zapobiegania i kontroli ryzyka systemowego i systemu zarządzania ryzykiem zawodowym. Zapewnia to nowe metody i pomysły w zakresie zapobiegania i kontroli zagrożeń bezpieczeństwa w kopalniach węgla oraz ograniczania katastrof i wypadków.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Hao, X. and Ren, Y. 2015. Research on assessment in dicator system of the safety and high efficient and green underground coal mine. China Coal 3(7), pp. 69–72.
 
2.
He et al. 2016 – He, C., Li, X. and Wang, G. 2016. Design on Coal Mine Safety Supervision Index System for Safety Supervision Department. Safety in Coal Mines 4(2), pp. 235–237.
 
3.
Li et al. 2009 – Li, S., Cheng, L., Jing, X. and Xu, C. 2009. Study on construction method of evaluation index system for safety in put of coal mine. Journal of Safety Science and Technology 5(5), pp. 93–96.
 
4.
Li et al. 2020 – Li, S., Xue, G., Fang, X., Yang, Q., He, C., Han, S. and Kang, Y. 2020. Coal mine intelligent safety system and key technologies. Journal of China Coal Society 45(6), pp. 2320–2330.
 
5.
Liu et al. 2013 – Liu, G., Qi, A. and Li, S. 2013. On the evaluation model and method of safety hazard integration management maturity of coal mine. Journal of Safety and Environment 5(12), pp. 244–250.
 
6.
Meng et al. 2020 – Meng, S., Yang, W., Li, H., Wang, M. and Sun, Y. 2020. Preliminary study on the early warning of coal mine gas disaster induced by shake. World Earthquake Engineering 36(2), pp. 218–228.
 
7.
Meng et al. 2022 – Meng, S., Mu, H., Wang, M., Yang, W., Liu, Y., Sun, Y. and Yuan, X. 2022. Characteristics and Identification Method of Natural and Mine Earthquakes: A Case Study on the Hegang Mining Area. Minerals 12(10), DOI: 10.3390/min121012561256.
 
8.
Qiao, G. 2013. A Study on the Coal Mine Safety Comprehensive Evaluation and Risk Warning Management Mode. PhD thesis. China University Geosciences.
 
9.
Sui et al. 2019 – Sui, W., Wang, D., Sun, Y., Yang, W., Xu, Z. and Feng, L. 2019. Mine hydrogeogical structure and its responses to mining. Journal of Engineering Geology 27(1), pp. 21–28, DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2019-072.
 
10.
Wang et al. 2014 – Wang, J., Zhai, X. and Feng, L. 2014. Efficiency optimization of coal mine production on logistics under safety hard constraint. Chinese Journal of Management Science 7(13), pp. 59–66.
 
11.
Xie et al. 2012 – Xie, H., Zhou, H., Xu, D., Hongwei, W., Ru, Z. and Feng, G. 2012. Research and consideration on deep coal mining and critical mining depth. Journal of China Coal Society 37(4), pp. 535–542.
 
12.
Xu, D. 2022. Characteristics and occurrence regularity of coal mine accidents in China from 2020 to 2021. Coal Engineering 54(7), pp. 129–133.
 
13.
Xu et al. 2020 – Xu, Z., Gao, X., Li, Z., Wu, T., Zheng, T., Wen, X., He, R., Li, H. and Wang, K. 2020. Investigation on Public Service Demand of Earthquakes Induced by Human Activities Including Mining and Reservoir Impoundment. Earthquake Research in China 36(3), pp. 630–638.
 
14.
Yang, C. 2015. Study on the system of coal mine safety risk prevention and control based on internal control management. China Coal 41(7), pp. 120–123.
 
15.
Yang et al. 2015 – Yang, J., He, F., Cui, T., Bai, R., Yu, Y. and Song, H. 2015. Safety analysis of coal mine disaster based on factor analysis. Journal of Safety Science and Technology 11(04), pp. 84–89.
 
16.
You, D. and Qi, A. 2011. Safety integration management system of coal mining enterprise and its evaluation model based on ANP. China Safety Science Journal 1(14), pp. 60–65.
 
17.
Yuan, L. 2017. Scientific conception of precision coal mining. Journal of China Coal Society 42(1), pp. 1–7, DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2016.1661.
 
18.
Yuan, L. 2021. Study on the development strategy of coal mine safety in China. China Coal 47(6), pp. 1–6.
 
19.
Yuan et al. 2018 – Yuan, L., Jiang, Y., He, X. and Dou, L. 2018. Research progress of precise risk accurate identification and monitoring early warning on typical dynamic disasters in coal mine. Journal of China Coal Society 43(2), pp. 306–318, DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.4151.
 
20.
Yuan et al. 2020 – Yuan, J., Sun, R. and Yuan, X. 2020. Framework of risk governing of earthquake disaster for civil engineering. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics 40(2), pp. 145–153.
 
21.
Zhang et al. 2005 –Zhang, F., Yu, Z., Xu, X., Yang, W., Zhang, S., Liu, J., Liu, T. and Zhou H. 2005 Research on induced earthquakes by coal mining in hegang. Journal of Natural Disasters 1, pp. 139–143.
 
22.
Zhang et al. 2022 – Zhang, J., Hou, T., Li, M., Li, P. and Gu, H. 2022. Mechanism and prevention measures of rock burst induced by dynamic disturbance in coal seam roadway. Coal Engineering 54(2), pp. 62–66.
 
23.
Zhao, G. 2020. Research on Internal Control Evaluation System of Safety Responsibility of Coal Enterprises-Take Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. Master thesis. Xian University of Science and Technology.
 
24.
Zhao, Z. 2022. Identification of key risks of coal mine safety accidents based on cases and standards. Master thesis. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law.
 
eISSN:2299-2324
ISSN:0860-0953
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top