ORIGINAL PAPER
Zeolite mining industry in the Visegrad Group (V4) countries: a SWOT-AHP analysis of strategic, economic, and environmental factors
1
Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences
2
Research Unit of Geophysics, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien
3
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences
4
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava
5
Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague
6
Institute of Exploration Geosciences, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of Miskolc
Submission date: 2026-04-08
Final revision date: 2026-05-12
Acceptance date: 2026-05-17
Publication date: 2026-09-28
Corresponding author
Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 2026;42(3):85-110
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This article assesses the potential and challenges of the natural zeolite mining industry in the Visegrad Group (V4) countries: Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary. Amid global sustainability challenges, the sector is gaining socio-economic importance due to the growing demand for eco-friendly materials with unique adsorption and catalytic properties. The Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, combined with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), enables the identification and ranking of the industry’s key internal and external factors. The SWOT-AHP results indicate that high-quality deposits, a broad product portfolio, and advanced quality management are critical regional advantages. Conversely, high labor and logistics costs, the environmental impacts of extraction, and internal market competition were identified as weaknesses. Furthermore, economic uncertainty and the availability of substitutes represent significant threats to the industry’s stability. Exploring new applications, expanding to diverse sectors (such as agriculture and water treatment), and adapting to consumer trends present major opportunities for growth. Strategic priorities highlight that a strengths-opportunities (SO) approach enables firms to proactively leverage key assets to meet the growing demand for environmental adsorbents. Concurrently, a strengths-threats (ST) strategy helps mitigate risks associated with zeolite substitutes and global economic fluctuations. The article provides evidence-based recommendations to enhance regional competitiveness and sustainable development, while encouraging collaborative innovations between enterprises, policymakers, and research institutions.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the Visegrad Fund (project ID: 22030212), the statutory works of the Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, and the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA (1/0306/23).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Przemysł wydobywczy zeolitów w krajach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej (V4): analiza SWOT-AHP czynników strategicznych, ekonomicznych i środowiskowych
strategie, zasoby naturalne, przemysł wydobywczy, zeolity, SWOT-AHP
W artykule ocenione są potencjał i wyzwania branży wydobywczej zeolitów naturalnych w państwach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej (V4): Polsce, Czechach, Słowacji i na Węgrzech. W obliczu globalnych wyzwań zrównoważonego rozwoju sektor zyskuje znaczenie społeczno-gospodarcze dzięki rosnącemu popytowi na ekologiczne materiały o unikalnych właściwościach adsorpcyjnych i katalitycznych. Analiza silnych i słabych stron, szans oraz zagrożeń (SWOT) w połączeniu z metodą AHP pozwala zidentyfikować i uszeregować kluczowe czynniki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne branży. Wyniki SWOT-AHP wskazują, że wysokiej jakości złoża, szerokie portfolio produktów oraz zaawansowane zarządzanie jakością to kluczowe przewagi regionalne. Z kolei wysokie koszty pracy i logistyki, środowiskowe skutki wydobycia oraz wewnętrzna konkurencja rynkowa to główne słabe strony. Ponadto niepewność gospodarcza i dostępność substytutów stanowią poważne zagrożenia dla stabilności branży. Odkrywanie nowych zastosowań, ekspansja do różnych sektorów (jak rolnictwo i oczyszczanie wody) oraz adaptacja do trendów konsumenckich to ogromne szanse rozwoju. Priorytety strategiczne pokazują, że podejście oparte na silnych stronach i szansach (SO) pozwala firmom proaktywnie wykorzystać atuty do zaspokojenia rosnącego popytu na adsorbenty środowiskowe. Jednocześnie strategia oparta na silnych stronach i zagrożeniach (ST) pomaga łagodzić ryzyka związane z substytutami zeolitów oraz globalnymi wahaniami gospodarczymi. Artykuł dostarcza opartych na dowodach rekomendacji mających na celu wspieranie regionalnej konkurencyjności oraz zrównoważonego rozwoju, zachęcając do innowacyjnej współpracy między przedsiębiorstwami, decydentami politycznymi i instytucjami badawczymi.
REFERENCES (81)
1.
Afolayan et al. 2020 – Afolayan, A.H., Ojokoh, B.A. and Adetunmbi, A.O. 2020. Performance analysis of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision support models for contractor selection. Scientific African 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scia....
2.
Agboola et al. 2020 – Agboola, O., Babatunde, D.E., Isaac Fayomi, O.S., Sadiku, E.R., Popoola, P., Moropeng, L., Yahaya, A. and Mamudu, O.A. 2020. A review on the impact of mining operation: Monitoring, assessment and management. Results in Engineering 8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rine....
3.
Alsawalha, M. 2019. Overview of Current and Future Perspectives of Saudi Arabian Natural Clinoptilolite Zeolite: A Case Review. Journal of Chemistry 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3....
4.
Baglioni, E. and Campling, L. 2017. Natural resource industries as global value chains: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(11), pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/030851....
5.
Bish, D.L. and Ming, D.W. 2001. Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications. [In:] Bish, D. L. and Ming, D. W. eds. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. Mineralogical Society in America, pp. 1–654.
6.
Borsatto, F. and Inglezakis, V.J. 2012. Natural zeolite markets and strategic considerations. [In:] Inglezakis, V. J. ed. Handbook of Natural Zeolites. United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science Publishers, pp. 11–27, https://doi.org/10.2174/978160....
7.
Brudermann, T. and Sangkakool, T. 2017. Green roofs in temperate climate cities in Europe – An analysis of key decision factors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 21, pp. 224–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
8.
Colella, C. 2005. Natural zeolites. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 157, pp. 13–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-....
9.
Dashwood, H.S. 2014. Sustainable Development and Industry Self-Regulation: Developments in the Global Mining Sector. Business and Society 53(4), pp. 551–582, https://doi.org/10.1177/000765....
10.
Ding et al. 2023 – Ding, C., Zhang, R. and Wu, X. 2023. The impact of product diversity and distribution networks on consumption expansion. Journal of Business Research 161(263), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
11.
Domaracká et al. 2015 – Domaracká, L., Štrba, L., Kršák, B. and Muchová, M. 2015. Possibilities of profitable business with nature zeolite – an example from the Nižný Hrabovec deposit, Slovakia. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology 2(1), pp. 12–19.
12.
Drevko et al. 2018 – Drevko, S., Drevková, M. and Vasilková Kmecová, M. 2018. Regional Mining of Zeolite, Current Mining Management and Quality Perspective by 2050. In: E3S Web of Conferences. IIIrd International Innovative Mining Symposium, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
13.
Eroglu et al. 2017 – Eroglu, N., Emekci, M. and Athanassiou, C.G. 2017. Applications of natural zeolites on agriculture and food production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 97(11), pp. 3487–3499, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8....
14.
Espinoza, R.D. and Morris, J.W.F. 2017. Towards sustainable mining (part II): Accounting for mine reclamation and post reclamation care liabilities. Resources Policy 52, pp. 29–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
15.
Franks, D.M. 2020. Reclaiming the neglected minerals of development. Extractive Industries and Society 7(2), pp. 453–460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis....
16.
Gałaś, S. and Gałaś, A. 2016. The qualification process of mining projects in environmental impact assessment: Criteria and thresholds. Resources Policy 49, pp. 204–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
17.
Gałaś et al. 2015 – Gałaś, S., Gałaś, A., Zeleňáková, M., Zvijáková, L., Fialová, J. and Kubíčková, H. 2015. Environmental Impact Assessment in the Visegrad Group countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 55, pp. 11–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
18.
Gałaś et al. 2021 – Gałaś, S., Kot-Niewiadomska, A., Gałaś, A., Kondela, J. and Wertichovà, B. 2021. Instruments of mineral deposit safeguarding in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia-comparative analysis. Resources 10(2), pp. 1–38, https://doi.org/10.3390/resour....
19.
García-Quevedo, J. and Jové-Llopis, E. 2021. Environmental policies and energy efficiency investments. An industry-level analysis. Energy Policy 156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
20.
Gawlik, L. 2008. Construction and validation of econometric model of linear dependence between costs and coal production level. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 24(1), pp. 27–44 (in Polish).
21.
Ghazinoory et al. 2011 – Ghazinoory, S., Abdi, M. and Azadegan-Mehr, M. 2011. SWOT methodology: a state-of-the-art review for the past, a framework for the future. Journal of Business Economics and Management 12(1), pp. 24–48, https://doi.org/10.3846/161116....
22.
Grifasi et al. 2025 – Grifasi, N., Ziantoni, B., Fino, D. and Piumetti, M. 2025. Fundamental properties and sustainable applications of the natural zeolite clinoptilolite. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 32, pp. 27805–27840, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
23.
Hayati et al. 2023 – Hayati, M., Mahdevari, S. and Barani, K. 2023. An improved MADM-based SWOT analysis for strategic planning in dimension stones industry. Resources Policy 80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
24.
Helms, M.M. and Nixon, J. 2010. Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management 3(3), pp. 215–251, https://doi.org/10.1108/175542....
25.
Herrmann et al. 2000 – Herrmann, A., Huber, F. and Braunstein, C. 2000. Market-driven product and service design: Bridging the gap between customer needs, quality management, and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Production Economics 66(1), pp. 77–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-....
26.
Huang, J.W. and Li, Y.H. 2018. How resource alignment moderates the relationship between environmental innovation strategy and green innovation performance. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 33(3), pp. 316–324, https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-1....
27.
Humphreys, D. 2019. The mining industry after the boom. Mineral Economics 32, pp. 145–151, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563....
28.
Igogo et al. 2021 – Igogo, T., Awuah-Offei, K., Newman, A., Lowder, T. and Engel-Cox, J. 2021. Integrating renewable energy into mining operations: Opportunities, challenges, and enabling approaches. Applied Energy 300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
29.
Jędrusiak et al. 2023 – Jędrusiak, R., Bielowicz, B. and Drobniak, A. 2023. From waste to value: recovering critical raw materials from urban mines in the European Union and United States. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 39(3), pp. 43–63, https://doi.org/10.24425/gsm.2....
30.
Johnson et al. 2023 – Johnson, E.L., Ericsson, M. and Löf, A. 2023. The mining permitting process in selected developed economies. Land Use Policy 131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
31.
Kafu-Quvane, B. and Mlaba, S. 2024. Assessing the Impact of Quarrying as an Environmental Ethic Crisis: A Case Study of Limestone Mining in a Rural Community. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21(4), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
32.
Kapeluszna et al. 2021 – Kapeluszna, E., Szudek, W., Wolka, P. and Zieliński, A. 2021. Implementation of Alternative Mineral Additives in Low-Emission Sustainable Cement Composites. Materials 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1421....
33.
Kar, A. and Datta, P.R. 2020. Logistics Cost Dynamics in International Business: A Causal Approach. Foreign Trade Review 55(4), pp. 478–495, https://doi.org/10.1177/001573....
34.
Kasztelewicz, Z. and Ptak, M. 2009. The procedure of environmental impact assessment in opencast mining in the light of new law regulations with particular focus on the specific character of Nature 2000 areas. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 25(3), pp. 157–170.
35.
Koudelková et al. 2025 – Koudelková, J., Urbanec, V., Hummel, M. and Mierva, P. 2025. Changes in Royalties from Mineral Extraction and Their Budgetary Allocation in Relation to Environmental Protection in the Czech Republic. In: Engineering Proceedings. The 5th International Conference on Advances in Environmental Engineering 116, https://doi.org/10.3390/engpro....
36.
KR Group 2026 – Slovak 3rd Consolidation package. [Online:] https://www.krgroup.eu/slovak-... [Accessed: 2026-05-11].
37.
Król, M. 2020. Natural vs. Synthetic zeolites. Crystals 10(7), pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1....
38.
Kulczycka et al. 2017 – Kulczycka, J., Wirth, H. and Hausner, J. 2017. Polish tax policy – its impact on the mineral sector. Resources Policy 52, pp. 72–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
39.
Kunecki et al. 2021 – Kunecki, P., Czarna-Juszkiewicz, D. and Wdowin, M. 2021. Analysis of solid sorbents for control and removal processes for elemental mercury from gas streams: a review. International Journal of Coal Science and Technology 8(1), pp. 23–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789....
40.
Kurttila et al. 2000 – Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J. and Kajanus, M. 2000. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis – a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics 1(1), pp. 41–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-....
41.
Kyle, J.R. and Elliott, B.A. 2019. Past, Present, and Future of Texas Industrial Minerals. Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration 36(2), pp. 475–486, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461....
42.
Laing, T. 2020. The economic impact of the Coronavirus 2019 (Covid-2019): Implications for the mining industry. The Extractive Industries and Society 7(2), pp. 580–582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis....
43.
Laporte, B. and de Quatrebarbes, C. 2015. What do we know about the sharing of mineral resource rent in Africa? Resources Policy 46, pp. 239–249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
44.
Lee et al. 2021 – Lee, J., Kim, I., Kim, H. and Kang, J. 2021. SWOT-AHP analysis of the Korean satellite and space industry: Strategy recommendations for development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
45.
Li et al. 2021 – Li, G., Yang, L., Zhang, B., Li, X. and Chen, F. 2021. How do environmental values impact green product purchase intention? The moderating role of green trust. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(33), pp. 46020–46034, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
46.
Liuyi et al. 2023 – Liuyi, Y., Yunchan, Z. and Feirong, R. 2023. Does government investment push up manufacturing labor costs? Evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10(1), pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599....
47.
Magda et al. 2005 – Magda, R., Franik, T. and Woźny, T. 2005. Analysıs of r.o.m. productıon, employment and cost of wages for the mıne contınuous runnıng organızatıon system. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 21(3), pp. 63–74 (in Polish).
48.
Morante-Carballo et al. 2021 – Morante-Carballo, F., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P. and Jácome-Francis, K. 2021. Worldwide research analysis on natural zeolites as environmental remediation materials. Sustainability 13(11), pp. 1–21, https://doi.org/10.3390/su1311....
49.
Novy-Marx, R. 2013. The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics 108(1), pp. 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfin....
50.
Regueiro, M. and Alonso-Jimenez, A. 2021. Minerals in the future of Europe. Mineral Economics 34(2), pp. 209–224, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563....
51.
RMC 2025 – WHAT IS CLINOPTILOLITE? The Industrialized One. [Online:] https://www.rotamining.com/cli... [Accessed: 2025-02-15].
52.
Saaty, T.L. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48(1), pp. 9–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2....
53.
Saaty, T.L. 1999. Decision Making for Leaders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Pittsburgh, US: RWS Publications.
54.
Sánchez, F. and Hartlieb, P. 2020. Innovation in the Mining Industry: Technological Trends and a Case Study of the Challenges of Disruptive Innovation. Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration 37(5), pp. 1385–1399, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461....
55.
Sfreddo et al. 2021 – Sfreddo, L.S., Vieira, G.B.B., Vidor, G. and Santos, C.H.S. 2021. ISO 9001 based quality management systems and organisational performance: a systematic literature review. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 32(3–4), pp. 389–409, https://doi.org/10.1080/147833....
56.
Simonidesová et al. 2021 – Simonidesová, J., Kudlová, Z., Lukáč, J., Manová, E. and Čulková, K. 2021. Tax aspects of mining companies in v4 countries. Acta Montanistica Slovaca 26(1), pp. 35–46, https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v....
57.
Sobczyk et al. 2020 – Sobczyk, W., Kowalska, A. and Sobczyk, E.J. 2020. Analysis of the Causes of Conflict between the Miners and Naturalists. Journal of the Polish Mineral Engineering Society 1(1), pp. 119–123, https://doi.org/10.29227/IM-20....
58.
Söderholm, P. 2023. How environmental permitting uncertainty in large-scale mining could influence subcontractors: The underlying chicken-and-egg problem. Resources Policy 82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
59.
Söderholm et al. 2015 – Söderholm, K., Söderholm, P., Helenius, H., Pettersson, M., Viklund, R., Masloboev, V., Mingaleva, T. and Petrov, V. 2015. Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the mining industry: Permitting processes with special focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia. Resources Policy 43, pp. 130–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
60.
Spanidis et al. 2023 – Spanidis, P.-M., Roumpos, C. and Pavloudakis, F. 2023. Evaluation of Strategies for the Sustainable Transformation of Surface Coal Mines Using a Combined SWOT – AHP Methodology. Sustainability 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/su1510....
61.
Šimková et al. 2019 – Šimková, Z., Grohol, M., Kubacki, K. and Kapko, M. 2019. Assessment of socio-economic impacts of zeolite mining to regional development – Case study. In: E3S Web of Conferences. IVth International Innovative Mining Symposium 105, 04009, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
62.
Šljivić et al. 2009 – Šljivić, M., Smičiklas, I., Pejanović, S. and Plećaš, I. 2009. Comparative study of Cu2+ adsorption on a zeolite, a clay and a diatomite from Serbia. Applied Clay Science 43(1), pp. 33–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay....
63.
Trading Economics 2024 – Labour Costs. [Online:] https://tradingeconomics.com/c... [Accessed: 2024-05-05].
64.
Trzaskuś-Zak, B. and Fuksa, D. 2008. The assignation of fıxed and variable costs of opencast mines: Rock and road raw materials. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 24(1), pp. 45–78 (in Polish).
65.
U.S. Geological Survey 2024 – Mineral commodity summaries 2024: U.S. Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs202....
66.
United Nations 2015 – The Sustainable Development Goals. [Online:] https://sdgs.un.org/goals/ [Accessed: 2025-06-12].
67.
Upstill, G. and Hall, P. 2006. Innovation in the minerals industry: Australia in a global context. Resources Policy 31(3), pp. 137–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
68.
Vartašová, A. and Červená, K. 2022. Real Property Tax in the Countries of Visegrad Group – Comparative View. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 31(1), pp. 191–211, https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2....
69.
Virtue Market Research 2023 – Natural Zeolites Market. [Online:] https://virtuemarketresearch.c... [Accessed: 2023-11-12].
70.
Visser, E.J. and Atzema, O. 2008. With or without clusters: Facilitating innovation through a differentiated and combined network approach. European Planning Studies 16(9), pp. 1169–1188, https://doi.org/10.1080/096543....
71.
VMR 2021 – Global Natural Zeolites Market Research Report 2020–2027. [Online:] https://www.valuemarketresearc... [Accessed: 2022-02-01].
72.
Wdowin et al. 2014 – Wdowin, M., Franus, M., Panek, R., Badura, L. and Franus, W. 2014. The conversion technology of fly ash into zeolites. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 16(6), pp. 1217–1223, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098....
73.
Yan, W. and Yu, J. 2023. Our journey in zeolite science. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micr....
74.
Yıldız, D.T. 2020. Forest fees paid to permit mining extractive operations on Turkey’s forestlands & the ratio to investments. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 36(3), pp. 29–58, https://doi.org/10.24425/gsm.2....
75.
Yıldız, D.T. 2021. How can the effects of EIA procedures and legislation foreseen for the mining operation activities to mining change positively in Turkey? Resources Policy 72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
76.
Yıldız, D.T. 2022a. How can the state rights be calculated by considering a high share of state right in mining operating costs in Turkey? Resources Policy 75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
77.
Yıldız, D.T. 2022b. Supervisor fund expectation for the guarantee of salaries in the presence of the effect of permanent supervisor salaries on mining operating costs in Turkey. Resources Policy 77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
78.
Yıldız, D.T. 2024. Considering the development levels of countries, contributions of mineral recovery from mining tailings and urban mining wastes to sustainability criteria – A review. Resources Policy 99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
79.
Yıldız, D.T. 2026. A review of the sustainable contributions of the use of some mine wastes in soil improvement and as fertilizer in agriculture. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 42(1), pp. 5–44, https://doi.org/10.24425/gsm.2....
80.
Yıldız et al. 2024 – Yıldız, D.T., Güner, M.O. and Kural, O. 2024. Effects of EU-Compliant mining waste regulation on Turkish mining sector: A review of characterization, classification, storage, management, recovery of mineral wastes. Resources Policy 90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso....
81.
Yousefian et al. 2024 – Yousefian, M., Bascompta, M., Sanmiquel, L., Vintró, C. and Sidki-Rius, N. 2024. Corporate social responsibility and total factor productivity: the case of European mining industry. Mineral Economics 37(1), pp. 149–161, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2299-2324 |
| ISSN: | 0860-0953 |
© 2006-2026 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
